Skip to main content

Journal of Population Sciences

Table 7 Family composition effects on parents’ participation in domestic activities in minutes per day (OLS model)

From: The time benefits of young adult home stayers in France and Italy: a new perspective on the transition to adulthood?

 

Italy

France

Ref = no child no young adult

Couple

Mother

Father

Couple

Mother

Father

1 young adult

23.82***

28.79***

−4,97

21,75

20.72**

1,03

(5.81)

(4.14)

(3.49)

(14.56)

(9.54)

(9.47)

1child <18

66.36***

51.87***

14.49***

65.63***

35.86***

29.77**

(9.01)

(6.42)

(5.41)

(18.88)

(12.36)

(12.28)

2 young adults

45.00***

43.44***

1,56

19,22

13,4

5,81

(6.54)

(4.66)

(3.92)

(20.48)

(13.41)

(13.32)

2 = 1 child + 1 young adult

66.17***

59.38***

6,79

71.36***

44.78***

26.58**

(8.16)

(5.81)

(4.90)

(20.62)

(13.50)

(13.41)

2 children

119.68***

88.28***

31.40***

84.82***

78.34***

6,48

(9.06)

(6.46)

(5.44)

(22.33)

(14.62)

(14.52)

≥3 young adults

38.79***

55.43***

−16.64**

97.17**

87.42***

9,74

(13.97)

(9.95)

(8.38)

(44.69)

(29.26)

(29.06)

≥3 at least 1 child 1 young adult

73.10***

79.96***

−6,86

89.86***

83.33***

6,53

(9.61)

(6.84)

(5.77)

(21.06)

(13.79)

13.70

≥3 children

152.82***

113.53***

39.29***

157.69***

127.20***

30,49

(16.67)

(11.87)

(10.00)

(30.30)

(19.84)

(19.70)

Constant

318.32***

219.20***

99.13***

192.87***

135.97***

56,9

(28.08)

(20.01)

(16.854)

(71.01)

(46.0)

(46.17)

Observations

11766

11766

11766

2258

2258

2258

R-squared

0,139

0,176

0,119

0,165

0,209

0,144

  1. French (1999) and Italian (2003) time-use surveys
  2. Controlled by women’s age, men’s age, couple employment status, couple educational level, number of rooms, presence of a garden, access to domestic services, town size, day of interview
  3. *Significant at 10%, **significant at 5%, ***significant at 1%