Skip to main content

Journal of Population Sciences

Table 6 Comparison of the mean fit to four models

From: A two-parameter hazard function to describe age patterns of mortality in ancient Northwestern Europe

 

Mean weighted root mean square error

Dataset

2-Par. modela

4-Par. modelb

Siler modelc

Brass ref level 12d

Brass, best level per period (level)e

Per period

     

EM 1640–1699 (n = 6)

0.174

0.162

0.191

0.200

0.178 (15)

EM 1700–1749 (n = 5)

0.187

0.162

0.170

0.185

0.184 (13)

EM 1750–1809 (n = 6)

0.158

0.147

0.163

0.166

0.165 (11)

HMD 1751–1800 (n = 50)

0.195

0.103

0.113

0.199

0.181 (8)

HMD 1801–1850 (n = 127)

0.111

0.071

0.077

0.135

0.132 (10)

HMD 1851–1900 (n = 350)

0.102

0.060

0.063

0.141

0.131 (7)

HMD 1901–1950 (n = 345)

0.066

0.036

0.049

0.120

0.103 (16)

HMD 1951–2000 (n = 350)

0.062

0.026

0.021

0.236

0.070 (24)

HMD 2001–2015 (n = 98)

0.105

0.040

0.029

0.284

0.086 (24)

Per country

     

HMD Belgium

0.0763

0.0403

0.0393

0.1621

 

HMD Denmark

0.0782

0.0420

0.0353

0.1799

 

EM England

0.1722

0.1567

0.1749

0.1835

 

HMD England & Wales

0.0726

0.0399

0.0495

0.1875

 

HMD France

0.1045

0.0582

0.0714

0.1784

 

HMD Netherlands

0.0812

0.0356

0.0351

0.1679

 

HMD Norway

0.0810

0.0448

0.0465

0.1778

 

HMD Sweden

0.1019

0.0537

0.0578

0.1613

 

All 1337 life tables

0.0877

0.0473

0.0506

0.1730

 
  1. Notes:
  2. aOur two-parameter model: see equations 11a-c.
  3. bOur four-parameter model: see equations 2-5.
  4. cThe Siler model: see equation 1.
  5. dThe Brass logit method with Princeton Model West level 12 as its reference.
  6. eThe Brass logit method with the best-suited Princeton Model West level per period, taken from Additional file 1.
  7. Source data: Human Mortality Database (2017, 2017, 2018); Wrigley et al. (1997: 224, 239, 250, 290)