Skip to main content

Journal of Population Sciences

Table 5 Logistic regression results for differences in fertility preferences between migrants and non-migrants, PMA2020 Project, Kinshasa 2013

From: The fertility of internal migrants to Kinshasa

 

Unmet need

Want another child

Most recent birth unintended

 

Odds

SE

Odds

SE

Odds

SE

Migrant

1.11

0.18

1.01

0.18

1.07

0.17

Births

1.12***

0.04

2.21***

0.13

1.49***

0.07

Age

0.95***

0.01

0.64***

0.04

0.72***

0.05

Age2

----

----

1.01***

0.00

1.00***

0.00

Level of education

      

 No education (ref.)

----

----

----

----

----

----

 Primary school

1.49

0.37

1.28

0.37

1.42

0.33

 Middle secondary

1.16

0.31

1.12

0.34

1.56*

0.40

 Advanced secondary +

0.57

0.22

1.46

0.60

0.84

0.31

Marital status

      

 Married (ref.)

----

----

----

----

----

----

 Separated/divorced/widowed

2.99***

0.77

1.74

0.62

1.22

0.34

 Never married

----

----

1.29

0.25

4.09***

0.78

Household wealth

      

 Quintile 1 (lowest, ref.)

----

----

----

----

----

----

 Quintile 2

1.12

0.21

0.91

0.19

1.43*

0.28

 Quintile 3

0.99

0.20

1.09

0.23

0.91

0.18

 Quintile 4

0.81

0.17

1.10

0.24

0.94

0.20

 Quintile 5 (highest)

1.15

0.26

1.12

0.25

1.09

0.25

N=

1175

2197

1296

  1. *p ≤ 0.10; **p ≤ 0.05; ***p ≤ 0.01; the quadratic term for age was not statistically significant in the model for unmet need and was therefore left out; unmet need was calculated only for ever-married women, and recent birth unintended was available only for women ever giving birth