| |
Only country variable
|
+ age
|
+ education
|
+ employment status
|
+ sibling size and composition
|
+ mother’s characteristics
|
+ home and domestic help
|
|---|
|
Men
|
|
Italy (ref=France)
|
−45.754***
|
−53.310***
|
−52.004***
|
−50.280***
|
−48.854***
|
−43.570***
|
−37.918***
|
|
se
|
(6.588)
|
(6.761)
|
(6.892)
|
(6.909)
|
(7.152)
|
(7.523)
|
(7.705)
|
|
Marginal effect
|
−21.29
|
−25.22
|
−24.51
|
−23.58
|
−22.84
|
−20.1
|
−17.27
|
|
Women
|
|
Italy (ref=France)
|
−2.254
|
−11.696*
|
−9.741
|
−17.556***
|
−16.608**
|
−14.282**
|
−15.185**
|
|
se
|
(6.481)
|
(6.609)
|
(6.765)
|
(6.523)
|
(6.723)
|
(7.033)
|
(7.317)
|
|
Marginal effect
|
−1.69
|
−8.9
|
−7.41
|
−13.65
|
−12.91
|
−11.09
|
−12.64
|
- French (1999) and Italian (2003) time-use surveys, pooled data
- Controlled always for interview day: + age, age squared, + education level, + activity status, + number of children under 18, number of young adults, sex composition of the young adults siblings, + mother’s employment status, mother’s level of education, + number of rooms, presence of a garden, access to domestic services, town size.
- Standard errors in parentheses, *significant at 10%, **significant at 5%; ***significant at 1%
- Tobit model comparing Italy with respect to France, with stepwise introduction of control variables
