Skip to main content

Journal of Population Sciences

Table 6 Results of logistic regression models

From: An explorative approach to the cross-section of international migration and sexual preference: same-sex couples in Germany

Dependent variable: Same-sex union (no (0)/ yes (1))

Model 1: Migrant status

Model 2: Individual characteristics

Model 3: Couple characteristics

AME

p value

AME

p value

AME

p value

“Migrant”

Yes (ref.: “native”)

− 0.01

< 0.001

− 0.01

< 0.001

− 0.01

< 0.001

Sex

Women (ref.: men)

  

< 0.01

0.227

< 0.01

0.900

Birth cohort (ref.: 1960–1977)

1943 to 1959

  

< 0.01

< 0.001

< 0.01

< 0.001

1978 to 1995

  

0.03

< 0.001

0.03

< 0.001

Educational level

Secondary or higher (ref.: lower than secondary level)

  

< 0.01

0.005

< 0.01

0.005

Exogamous union

Yes (ref.: no)

    

− 0.00

0.048

Age differences

No differences (ref.: 4 or more years younger/older)

    

0.02

< 0.001

Educational differences

Same level (ref.: educational differences)

    

0.01

< 0.001

N

 

165,318

165,318

165,318

Nagelkerke R2

 

0.002

0.033

0.072

  1. Source: Calculations based on German Micro census SUF 2013
  2. Note: All models estimated for the upper boundary of same-sex unions and for the definition of migrants as persons who moved to Germany or who were born as the (grand) child of at least one parent who was not born in Germany