Skip to main content

Journal of Population Sciences

Table 2 Effects of geographical mobility on occupational achievement by sex. Linear probability panel models with FE. Beta coefficients and robust se. Different controls for origin/destination

From: Social origins, geographical mobility and occupational attainment in contemporary Italy

 

Employed

Upper class

Avoid WC

Avoid AGR

λ

σ

λ

σ

λ

σ

λ

σ

Male

 M1: Gross effect

0.06

(0.01)

0.02**

(0.01)

− 0.04***

(0.01)

0.02***

(0.01)

Controls

 M2: South-North

0.04***

(0.01)

0.02*

(0.01)

− 0.03**

(0.01)

0.02***

(0.01)

 M3: Macro-regions

0.04***

(0.01)

0.02**

(0.01)

− 0.02

(0.01)

0.02***

(0.01)

 M4: Regions

0.03**

(0.01)

0.01

(0.01)

− 0.02

(0.01)

0.02***

(0.01)

Female

 M1: Gross effect

− 0.03*

(0.01)

0.01*

(0.01)

0.02

(0.01)

0.01**

(0.01)

Controls

 M2: South-North

− 0.06***

(0.02)

0.01

(0.01)

0.05***

(0.01)

0.01**

(0.01)

 M3: Macro-regions

− 0.05***

(0.02)

0.01**

(0.01)

0.05***

(0.01)

0.01

(0.01)

 M4: Regions

− 0.06***

(0.02)

0.01

(0.01)

0.06***

(0.01)

0.01**

(0.01)

  1. All models control for region of current residence; enrollment in the educational system; marital status; parenthood; years (1955–2005) and age dummies (from 15 up to 55); highest educational level achieved. In addition, models from M2 on include an interaction term for geographical area of departure by geographical area of destination, defined in M2 as SNDepit × SNDestit, where SN is a dummy for south-north; in M3, as MacroDepit × MacroDestit, where Macro is macro regions (North-West, North-East, Center, South); in all models from M4 to M14 as RegDepit × RegDestit, where Reg is region
  2. *** = p<0.001; ** = p<0.05; * = p<0.1