Table 3 Multivariate Cox regression in hazard ratio of selected factors on timing of first marriage
From: Fertility transition in Rwanda: what does the trend in nuptiality reveal?
Variable and categories | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hazard ratio | ± 95 CI | Hazard ratio | ± 95 CI | |
Year | ||||
2005 | 1.000 | |||
2010 | 0.900*** | 0.868–0.933 | ||
2015 | 0.781*** | 0.753–0.811 | ||
Education | ||||
None | 1.000 | |||
Primary | 0.904*** | 0.872–0.938 | ||
Secondary + | 0.715*** | 0.674–0.759 | ||
Residence | ||||
Urban | 1.000 | |||
Rural | 1.149*** | 1.096–1.204 | ||
Occupation | ||||
Agriculture | 1.000 | |||
Not skilled | 1.050* | 0.993–1.110 | ||
Services | 0.852*** | 0.793–0.915 | ||
Not working | 0.967 | 0.921–1.016 | ||
Religion | ||||
Catholic | 1.000 | |||
Protestant | 1.045*** | 1.014–1.076 | ||
Muslim | 1.011 | 0.909–1.124 | ||
Others | 0.993 | 0.892–1.104 | ||
Province | ||||
South | 1.000 | |||
Kigali | 0.966 | 0.908–1.027 | ||
West | 1.250*** | 1.200–1.303 | ||
North | 1.402*** | 1.340–1.467 | ||
East | 1.288*** | 1.236–1.343 | ||
No sibling | ||||
0–3 | 1.000 | |||
4–7 | 0.976 | 0.934–1.021 | ||
8 + | 0.973 | 0.928–1.020 | ||
Missing | 0.888 | 0.698–1.130 | ||
Age first sex | ||||
< 16 | 1.000 | |||
16–18 | 1.027 | 0.963–1.094 | ||
19–21 | 0.494*** | 0.464–0.526 | ||
22 + | 0.148*** | 0.139–0.158 | ||
Unclear | 0.255*** | 0.228–0.285 | ||
Interaction terms | ||||
Education*year | ||||
Primary in 2010 | 0.858*** | 0.787–0.935 | ||
Second + in 2010 | 0.969 | 0.844–1.112 | ||
Primary in 2015 | 0.982 | 0.898–1.074 | ||
Second + in 2015 | 1.094 | 0.955–1.253 | ||
Residence *year | ||||
Rural in 2010 | 1.032 | 0.933–1.140 | ||
Rural in 2015 | 1.000 | 0.912–1.098 | ||