Journal of Population Sciences
From: Gendered division of housework and childcare and women’s intention to have a second child in Spain
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coef. (std. error) | P > z | Coef. (std. error) | P > z | Coef. (std. error) | P > z | |
Proportion of housework done by women | ||||||
0–40% | − 1.255 (0.539) | 0.02 | − 0.416 (1.060) | 0.695 | − 0.337 (0.653) | 0.606 |
41–60% | − 0.254 (0.174) | 0.145 | − 0.545 (0.292) | 0.062 | 0.040 (0.224) | 0.858 |
61–80% (Ref.) | ||||||
81–100% | − 0.362 (0.175) | 0.039 | − 0.376 (0.191) | 0.049 | − 0.232 (0.215) | 0.282 |
Mothers’ satisfaction with housework distribution | ||||||
0–8 (Ref.) | ||||||
9–10 | − 0.021 (0.273) | 0.939 | ||||
Distribution of housework## Satisfaction | ||||||
0–40% Highly satisfied | − 1.079 (1.250) | 0.388 | ||||
41–60% Highly satisfied | 0.409 (0.403) | 0.309 | ||||
61–80% Highly satisfied (Ref.) | ||||||
81–100% Highly satisfied | 0.112 (0.495) | 0.822 | ||||
University education | ||||||
Yes | 0.403 (0.169) | 0.017 | 0.403 (0.169) | 0.017 | 0.744 (0.247) | 0.003 |
No (Ref.) | ||||||
Distribution of housework##University | ||||||
0–40% University | − 2.596 (1.304) | 0.047 | ||||
41–60% University | − 0.725 (0.350) | 0.039 | ||||
61–80% University (Ref.) | ||||||
81–100% University | − 0.310 (0.360) | 0.388 | ||||
Proportion of housework done by other individuals | ||||||
0% (Ref.) | ||||||
1–30% | 0.013 (0.254) | 0.96 | 0.026 (0.255) | 0.918 | 0.020 (0.255) | 0.939 |
31–100% | 0.034 (0.285) | 0.906 | 0.062 (0.290) | 0.832 | 0.015 (0.286) | 0.958 |
Age | ||||||
< 35 years | 0.770 (0.171) | 0.000 | 0.761 (0.171) | 0.000 | 0.765 (0.172) | 0.000 |
35–39 years (Ref.) | ||||||
> 39 years | − 1.152 (0.180) | 0.000 | − 1.151 (0.181) | 0.000 | − 1.145 (0.181) | 0.000 |
Child’s age | ||||||
< 3 years | 0.626 (0.176) | 0.000 | 0.633 (0.177) | 0.000 | 0.625 (0.177) | 0.000 |
3–6 years (Ref.) | ||||||
6–13 years | − 0.674 (0.188) | 0.000 | − 0.670 (0.189) | 0.000 | − 0.713 (0.190) | 0.000 |
Migrant background (either partner) | ||||||
Yes | 0.096 (0.193) | 0.62 | 0.092 (0.195) | 0.636 | 0.131 (0.195) | 0.501 |
No (Ref.) | ||||||
Women’s attachment to the labour force | ||||||
Full-time | − 0.221 (0.218) | 0.31 | − 0.212 (0.221) | 0.338 | − 0.228 (0.218) | 0.296 |
Part-time | − 0.162 (0.241) | 0.501 | − 0.145 (0.244) | 0.553 | − 0.172 (0.242) | 0.477 |
Unemployed | − 0.165 (0.268) | 0.537 | − 0.157 (0.270) | 0.562 | − 0.173 (0.268) | 0.519 |
Inactive (Ref.) | ||||||
Men’s labour force status | ||||||
Self-employed (Ref.) | ||||||
Employed | − 0.191 (0.195) | 0.326 | − 0.185 (0.195) | 0.343 | − 0.187 (0.196) | 0.339 |
Unemployed / inactive | 0.263 (0.305) | 0.388 | 0.277 (0.306) | 0.364 | 0.231 (0.305) | 0.449 |
Differences in partners’ educational attainment | ||||||
Man has higher educational attainment | − 0.062 (0.215) | 0.774 | − 0.062 (0.215) | 0.775 | − 0.055 (0.215) | 0.798 |
Similar educational attainment (Ref.) | ||||||
Woman has higher educational attainment | − 0.309 (0.159) | 0.052 | − 0.304 (0.159) | 0.056 | − 0.301 (0.160) | 0.06 |
Presence of partner’s children | ||||||
Yes | − 1.146 (0.360) | 0.001 | − 1.179 (0.362) | 0.001 | − 1.194 (0.363) | 0.001 |
No (Ref.) | ||||||
Mother’s satisfaction with the relationship | ||||||
0–6 | − 0.888 (0.323) | 0.006 | − 0.869 (0.326) | 0.008 | − 0.875 (0.323) | 0.007 |
7–8 | − 0.288 (0.178) | 0.106 | − 0.255 (0.184) | 0.166 | − 0.299 (0.179) | 0.096 |
9 | − 0.233 (0.188) | 0.215 | − 0.217 (0.191) | 0.255 | − 0.244 (0.189) | 0.197 |
10 (Ref.) | ||||||
Const. | 0.582 (0.326) | 0.074 | 0.554 (0.341) | 0.104 | 0.457 (0.334) | 0.171 |