Journal of Population Sciences
Table 3 Logit models: childcare
From: Gendered division of housework and childcare and women’s intention to have a second child in Spain
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coef. (std. error) | P > z | Coef. (std. error) | P > z | Coef. (std. error) | P > z | |
Proportion of childcare done by women | ||||||
0–40% | − 0.400 (0.535) | 0.455 | − 0.215 (1.083) | 0.843 | − 0.525 (0.586) | 0.37 |
41–60% | − 0.268 (0.171) | 0.117 | − 0.218 (0.325) | 0.502 | − 0.156 (0.216) | 0.471 |
61–80% (Ref.) | ||||||
81–100% | − 0.044 (0.178) | 0.806 | − 0.208 (0.217) | 0.336 | − 0.069 (0.224) | 0.758 |
Mothers’ satisfaction with childcare distribution | ||||||
0–8 (Ref.) | ||||||
9–10 | − 0.285 (0.213) | 0.181 | ||||
Distribution of childcare## Satisfaction | ||||||
0–40% Highly satisfied | − 0.148 (1.240) | 0.905 | ||||
41–60% Highly satisfied | 0.032 (0.385) | 0.934 | ||||
61–80% Highly satisfied (Ref.) | ||||||
81–100% Highly satisfied | 0.450 (0.420) | 0.284 | ||||
University education | ||||||
Yes | 0.433 (0.166) | 0.009 | 0.442 (0.167) | 0.008 | 0.491 (0.230) | 0.033 |
No (Ref.) | ||||||
Distribution of childcare##University | ||||||
0–40% University | 0.907 (1.440) | 0.529 | ||||
41–60% University | − 0.292 (0.344) | 0.396 | ||||
61–80% University (Ref.) | ||||||
81–100% University | 0.063 (0.362) | 0.863 | ||||
Proportion of childcare done by other individuals | ||||||
0% (Ref.) | ||||||
1–30% | 0.331 (0.184) | 0.073 | 0.326 (0.185) | 0.078 | 0.326 (0.185) | 0.078 |
31–100% | 0.117 (0.237) | 0.62 | 0.105 (0.237) | 0.659 | 0.113 (0.236) | 0.632 |
Age | ||||||
< 35 years | 0.738 (0.170) | 0.000 | 0.749 (0.171) | 0.000 | 0.727 (0.170) | 0.000 |
35–39 years (Ref.) | ||||||
> 39 years | − 1.189 (0.181) | 0.000 | − 1.193 (0.181) | 0.000 | − 1.202 (0.182) | 0.000 |
Youngest child’s age | ||||||
< 3 years | 0.683 (0.178) | 0.000 | 0.671 (0.178) | 0.000 | 0.690 (0.178) | 0.000 |
3–6 years (Ref.) | ||||||
6–13 years | − 0.692 (0.196) | 0.000 | − 0.691 (0.197) | 0.000 | − 0.693 (0.197) | 0.000 |
Migrant (either partner) | ||||||
Yes | 0.081 (0.191) | 0.672 | 0.082 (0.192) | 0.669 | 0.085 (0.191) | 0.656 |
No (Ref.) | ||||||
Women’s attachment to the labour force | ||||||
Full-time | − 0.162 (0.213) | 0.447 | − 0.146 (0.213) | 0.493 | − 0.173 (0.213) | 0.418 |
Part-time | − 0.135 (0.239) | 0.571 | − 0.121 (0.239) | 0.612 | − 0.149 (0.240) | 0.535 |
Unemployed | − 0.140 (0.266) | 0.6 | − 0.124 (0.267) | 0.642 | − 0.146 (0.267) | 0.583 |
Inactive (Ref.) | ||||||
Men’s labour force status | ||||||
Self-employed (Ref.) | ||||||
Employed | − 0.151 (0.194) | 0.435 | − 0.140 (0.194) | 0.471 | − 0.152 (0.194) | 0.433 |
Unemployed/inactive | 0.302 (0.303) | 0.319 | 0.331 (0.305) | 0.278 | 0.297 (0.304) | 0.327 |
Combination of educational attainment | ||||||
Man has higher educational attainment | − 0.009 (0.214) | 0.968 | − 0.016 (0.215) | 0.942 | − 0.026 (0.215) | 0.904 |
Similar educational attainment (Ref.) | ||||||
Woman has higher educational attainment | − 0.329 (0.158) | 0.037 | − 0.347 (0.159) | 0.029 | − 0.336 (0.158) | 0.034 |
Presence of partner’s children | ||||||
Yes | − 1.156 (0.362) | 0.001 | − 1.178 (0.363) | 0.001 | − 1.166 (0.363) | 0.001 |
No (Ref.) | ||||||
Mother’s satisfaction with the relationship | ||||||
0–6 | − 0.932 (0.325) | 0.004 | − 0.961 (0.329) | 0.004 | − 0.933 (0.325) | 0.004 |
7–8 | − 0.366 (0.178) | 0.04 | − 0.424 (0.184) | 0.021 | − 0.373 (0.179) | 0.038 |
9 | − 0.238 (0.186) | 0.203 | − 0.275 (0.190) | 0.147 | − 0.254 (0.187) | 0.175 |
10 (Ref.) | ||||||
Const. | 0.335 (0.313) | 0.284 | 0.483 (0.335) | 0.149 | 0.339 (0.317) | 0.284 |