Skip to main content

Journal of Population Sciences

Table 1 Probability of parental informal childcare arrangements by children’s age

From: Informal childcare arrangements: a comparison between Italians and migrants

Variables

On their own

Grandparents

Other relatives

Non-relatives

No need

Households with children aged 0–5

Migrants (ref. Italians)

0.081 (0.066)

− 0.491 (0.000)

0.171 (0.000)

0.033 (0.004)

0.207 (0.000)

Household type (ref. Couple)

     

 Single parent family

0.007 (0.664)

− 0.047 (0.095)

0.022 (0.365)

0.136 (0.000)

− 0.118 (0.000)

 Composite household

− 0.024 (0.002)

0.199 (0.000)

− 0.012 (0.344)

− 0.029 (0.006)

− 0.135 (0.000)

Children aged 14-18 (ref. No)

− 0.034 (0.000)

− 0.034 (0.163)

0.129 (0.000)

− 0.021 (0.133)

− 0.039 (0.099)

Children’s activity (ref. No)

     

 At least one child

− 0.011 (0.207)

0.012 (0.515)

0.020 (0.116)

0.036 (0.003)

− 0.057 (0.001)

 All children

− 0.003 (0.741)

− 0.001 (0.966)

0.029 (0.028)

0.018 (0.103)

− 0.043 (0.014)

Territorial disadvantage (ref. Not at all or little)

     

 Enough or much

0.007 (0.324)

− 0.004 (0.763)

− 0.007 (0.476)

0.004 (0.674)

0.001 (0.954)

Area of residence (ref. North)

     

 Centre

0.015 (0.189)

0.062 (0.002)

− 0.027 (0.032)

− 0.020 (0.108)

− 0.027 (0.158)

 South

0.007 (0.493)

0.089 (0.000)

− 0.017 (0.254)

− 0.029 (0.011)

− 0.050 (0.007)

Highest educational level in the household (ref. Primary or none)

     

 Secondary

− 0.020 (0.237)

0.140 (0.001)

− 0.052 (0.045)

− 0.061 (0.037)

− 0.007 (0.839)

 Tertiary

0.023 (0.250)

0.122 (0.005)

− 0.074 (0.010)

− 0.073 (0.017)

0.001 (0.977)

Parent(s)’ employment status (ref. Both parents employed)

     

 Mother unemployed or inactive

− 0.015 (0.085)

− 0.167 (0.000)

− 0.013 (0.267)

0.003 (0.746)

0.192 (0.000)

 Father unemployed or inactive

0.014 (0.533)

− 0.109 (0.004)

0.012 (0.673)

0.011 (0.670)

0.072 (0.049)

 Both parents unemployed or inactive

− 0.034 (0.049)

− 0.103 (0.030)

− 0.002 (0.964)

0.029 (0.408)

0.109 (0.016)

Perception of the household economic condition (ref. Very good or adequate)

     

 Poor or insufficient

0.001 (0.851)

− 0.032 (0.026)

− 0.004 (0.673)

0.011 (0.260)

0.025 (0.087)

N. of households (unweighted)

3474

Households with children aged 6–13

Household type (ref. Couple)

     

 Single parent family

0.003 (0.802)

− 0.001 (0.970)

− 0.008 (0.677)

0.049 (0.011)

− 0.043 (0.049)

 Composite household

− 0.029 (0.000)

0.220 (0.000)

− 0.011 (0.527)

− 0.063 (0.000)

− 0.117 (0.000)

Children aged 14-18 (ref. No)

− 0.018 (0.009)

− 0.126 (0.000)

0.205 (0.000)

− 0.010 (0.348)

− 0.052 (0.000)

Children’s activity (ref. No)

     

 At least one child

− 0.023 (0.004)

0.082 (0.000)

0.010 (0.559)

0.003 (0.811)

− 0.071 (0.000)

 All children

− 0.017 (0.062)

0.047 (0.005)

− 0.004 (0.793)

0.004 (0.718)

− 0.030 (0.066)

Territorial disadvantage (ref. Not at all or little)

     

 Enough or much

0.012 (0.068)

− 0.004 (0.759)

0.013 (0.250)

− 0.009 (0.374)

− 0.012 (0.332)

Area of residence (ref. North)

     

 Centre

− 0.009 (0.265)

0.029 (0.118)

− 0.011 (0.454)

− 0.024 (0.072)

0.014 (0.430)

 South

0.004 (0.695)

0.093 (0.000)

− 0.008 (0.570)

− 0.050 (0.000)

− 0.038 (0.015)

Highest educational level in the household (ref. Primary or none)

     

 Secondary

0.015 (0.164)

0.141 (0.000)

− 0.085 (0.002)

− 0.063 (0.026)

− 0.007 (0.806)

 Tertiary

0.041 (0.004)

0.128 (0.002)

− 0.104 (0.001)

− 0.049 (0.116)

− 0.016 (0.621)

Parent(s)’ employment status (ref. Both parents employed)

     

 Mother unemployed or inactive

− 0.036 (0.000)

− 0.111 (0.000)

− 0.016 (0.191)

− 0.002 (0.874)

0.164 (0.000)

 Father unemployed or inactive

0.017 (0.419)

− 0.119 (0.001)

0.021 (0.478)

0.055 (0.066)

0.025 (0.391)

 Both parents unemployed or inactive

− 0.047 (0.004)

− 0.186 (0.000)

0.042 (0.271)

0.067 (0.089)

0.124 (0.004)

Perception of the household economic condition

(ref. Very good or adequate)

     

 Poor or insufficient

− 0.004 (0.533)

− 0.019 (0.190)

− 0.018 (0.133)

0.001 (0.982)

0.041 (0.002)

N. of households (unweighted)

4113

  1. AMEs are reported. (1) Results from the multinomial logistic regression model. (2) P-values in brackets. (3) Models are weighted
  2. Source: Authors’ elaboration on SCIF (2011–2012) and ADL (2011) data